.png){kind=icon}
返回
Comparative-historical methodology
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110507.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
The last decade featured the emergence of a significant and growing literature concerning comparative-historical methods. This literature offers methodological tools for causal and descriptive inference that go beyond the techniques currently available in mainstream statistical analysis. In terms of causal inference, new procedures exist for testing hypotheses about necessary and sufficient causes, and these procedures address the skepticism that mainstream methodologists may hold about necessary and sufficient causation. Likewise, new techniques are available for analyzing hypotheses that refer to complex temporal processes, including path-dependent sequences. In the area of descriptive inference, the comparative-historical literature offers important tools for concept analysis and for achieving measurement validity. Given these contributions, comparative-historical methods merit a central place within the general field of social science methodology.
Keyword:
necessary causes
sufficient causes
temporal processes
coacepts
measurement
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
9
论文数:
654
被引数:
1.7W
机构
暂无机构信息
引用论文
Influence of crosslink density on the interfacial characteristics of epoxy nanocomposites交联密度对环氧树脂纳米复合材料界面特性的影响.png)
Polymer
PolymerIF0
PREAI
分享收藏分享收藏
查看更多内容