.png){kind=icon}
返回
Comparative Hypothesis Testing Via Process Tracing
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1177/0049124113503142.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Causal inference via process tracing has received increasing attention during recent years. A 2 x 2 typology of hypothesis tests takes a central place in this debate. A discussion of the typology demonstrates that its role for causal inference can be improved further in three respects. First, the aim of this article is to formulate case selection principles for each of the four tests. Second, in focusing on the dimension of uniqueness of the 2 x 2 typology, I show that it is important to distinguish between theoretical and empirical uniqueness when choosing cases and generating inferences via process tracing. Third, I demonstrate that the standard reading of the so-called doubly decisive test is misleading. It conflates unique implications of a hypothesis with contradictory implications between one hypothesis and another. In order to remedy the current ambiguity of the dimension of uniqueness, I propose an expanded typology of hypothesis tests that is constituted by three dimensions.
Keyword:
causal inference
causal mechanisms
certainty
uniqueness
sufficiency
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
S
IF:
6.5
论文数:
1.2K
被引数:
8.6K
机构
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
<p>Safety and efficacy assessment of transarterial chemoembolization using drug-eluting beads in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and arterioportal shunt: a single-center experience</p>经动脉化疗栓塞术中使用药物洗脱微球对伴有肝动脉-门静脉分流的患者进行肝细胞癌的安全性和有效性评估：一项单中心经验OAAI
OAAI分享收藏分享收藏
查看更多内容