返回
Comparative Social Cognition
DOI:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163526.png)
摘要
En 中文
Theory of mind is said to be uniquely human. Is this statement justified? Thirty years of research on a variety of species has produced differences in opinion, from unequivocal positive evidence to no evidence at all for mental attribution in animals. Our review concludes that animals are excellent ethologists, but on the whole, poor psychologists. Those studies that we believe present a good case for mental attribution all possess high ecological validity, including studies on food competition by chimpanzees and cache-protection strategies by corvids. Even though the current focus of research on prediction rather food explanation may be misplaced, we believe the field is now in a strong position to discover what animals really know about their fellow beings, be it based on simple associations, behavior reading, mind reading, or something else.
Keyword:
theory of mind
object-choice task
mental attribution
cooperation
competition
relationship intelligence
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
29.4
论文数:
1.9K
被引数:
3.0W
机构
引用论文
Direct determination of monolayer MoS2and WSe2exciton binding energies on insulating and metallic substrates直接测定绝缘和金属基底上的单层MoS2 和WSe2 激子结合能
2D Materials
IF0
Effects of experience and social context on prospective caching strategies by scrub jays
NATURE
IF48.5

