返回
Comparing methods for constructing and representing human pangenome graphs
DOI:10.1186/s13059-023-03098-2.png)
摘要
En 中文
BackgroundAs a single reference genome cannot possibly represent all the variation present across human individuals, pangenome graphs have been introduced to incorporate population diversity within a wide range of genomic analyses. Several data structures have been proposed for representing collections of genomes as pangenomes, in particular graphs.ResultsIn this work, we collect all publicly available high-quality human haplotypes and construct the largest human pangenome graphs to date, incorporating 52 individuals in addition to two synthetic references (CHM13 and GRCh38). We build variation graphs and de Bruijn graphs of this collection using five of the state-of-the-art tools: Bifrost, mdbg, Minigraph, Minigraph-Cactus and pggb. We examine differences in the way each of these tools represents variations between input sequences, both in terms of overall graph structure and representation of specific genetic loci.ConclusionThis work sheds light on key differences between pangenome graph representations, informing end-users on how to select the most appropriate graph type for their application.
Keyword:
Pangenomics
de Bruijn graphs
Variation graphs
Sequence analysis
Algorithms
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
G
IF:
9.4
论文数:
6.4K
被引数:
7.3W
机构
引用论文
Pangenome-based genome inference allows efficient and accurate genotyping across a wide spectrum of variant classes
NATURE GENETICS
IF31.8
Evaluation of GRCh38 and de novo haploid genome assemblies demonstrates the enduring quality of the reference assemblyGRCh38和从头单倍体基因组装配的评估证明了参考装配的持久质量
GENOME RESEARCH
IF5.5

