.png){kind=icon}
返回
Comparison of base classifiers for multi-label learning
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.neucom.2020.01.102.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Multi-label learning methods can be categorised into algorithm adaptation, problem transformation and ensemble methods. Some of these methods depend on a base classifier and the relationship is not well understood. In this paper the sensitivity of five problem transformation and two ensemble methods to four types of classifiers is studied. Their performance across 11 benchmark datasets is measured using 16 evaluation metrics. The best classifier is shown to depend on the method: Support Vector Machines (SVM) for binary relevance, classifier chains, calibrated label ranking, quick weighted multi-label learning and RAndom k-labELsets; k-Nearest Neighbours (k-NN) and Naive Bayes (NB) for Hierarchy Of Multilabel classifiERs; and Decision Trees (DT) for ensemble of classifier chains. The statistical performance of a classifier is also found to be generally consistent across the metrics for any given method. Overall, DT and SVM have the best performance-computational time trade-off followed by k-NN and NB. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keyword:
Classification
Classifier
Experimental comparison
Multi-label
Multilabel
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
6.5
论文数:
2.5W
被引数:
6.5W
机构
引用论文
Electrical Conductivity of Reproductive Tissue for Detection of Estrus in Dairy Cows用于检测奶牛发情的繁殖组织电导率
OAAI
OAAI分享收藏An extensive experimental comparison of methods for multi-label learning.png)
PATTERN RECOGNITION
PATTERN RECOGNITIONIF7.6
PREAI
分享收藏分享收藏
查看更多内容