返回
Comparison of conceptually different multi-objective Bayesian optimization methods for material design problems
DOI:10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103440.png)
摘要
En 中文
For real-world applications, material properties must usually meet multiple requirements, and researchers often spend considerable time designing such materials by trial and error. Multi-objective Bayesian optimization (MOBO) constitutes a promising data-driven solution to accelerate such design problems. As things stand, conceptually different MOBO methods exist for material design problems, such as scalarization- and hypervolume-based methods. However, no standard approach exists to compare how these methods perform and the appropriate choice of MOBO method in each case remains unclear. Herein, a benchmark protocol to compare how conceptually different MOBO methods perform was introduced, based on which the performances of MOBO methods were comprehensively compared using multiple design problems and performance metrics. The benchmark results showed that there was no method that performed best for all combinations of design problems and performance metrics. Moreover, when multiple MOBO methods were compared, the opportunity cost of using each method emerged and it was shown that an inappropriately chosen method can hinder MOBO efficiency. The benchmark results shown here highlight the importance of choosing the right MOBO method and provide guidelines for how this can be done.
Keyword:
Multi-objective material design
Bayesian optimization
Machine learning
Benchmark
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
4.5
论文数:
1.6W
被引数:
3.7W
机构
暂无机构信息
引用论文
Accurate Multiobjective Design in a Space of Millions of Transition Metal Complexes with Neural-Network-Driven Efficient Global Optimization
ACS CENTRAL SCIENCE
IF10.4
Featureless adaptive optimization accelerates functional electronic materials design
APPLIED PHYSICS REVIEWS
IF11.6
Beyond Ternary OPV: High-Throughput Experimentation and Self-Driving Laboratories Optimize Multicomponent Systems
ADVANCED MATERIALS
IF26.8
Active learning in materials science with emphasis on adaptive sampling using uncertainties for targeted design材料科学中的主动学习,重点是使用不确定性进行针对性设计的自适应采样
Machine-learning-assisted thin-film growth: Bayesian optimization in molecular beam epitaxy of SrRuO3 thin films
APL MATERIALS
IF4.5
Chimera: enabling hierarchy based multi-objective optimization for self-driving laboratories
CHEMICAL SCIENCE
IF7.4

