.png){kind=icon}
返回
Compromise Rules Revisited
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1007/s10726-018-9598-2.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Decision makers often face a dilemma when they have to arbitrate between the quantity of support for a decision (i.e., the number of people who back it) and the quality of support (i.e., at which level to go down in voters' preferences to obtain sufficient level of support). The trade-off between the quality and quantity of support behind alternatives led to numerous suggestions in social choice theory: without being exhaustive we can mention Majoritarian Compromise, Fallback Bargaining, Set of Efficient Compromises, Condorcet Practical Method, Median Voting Rule, Majority Judgement. Our point is that all these concepts share a common feature which enables us to gather them in the same class, the class of compromise rules, which are all based upon elementary scoring rules described extensively by Saari. One can exploit his results to analyze the compromise rules with relative ease, which is a major point of our paper.
Keyword:
Compromise
Voting
Scoring rules
Borda
Condorcet
Saari
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
2.5
论文数:
1.3K
被引数:
1.4K
机构
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
An Antimony-Doped Tin Oxide Conductive Network for Flexible Electronics Based on Electrospinning
PREAI
分享收藏
查看更多内容