.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Conceptual analysis of mechanisms and methods in psychedelic clinical trial design: a narrative review
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
M
D
B
D
S
DOI：10.1177/20451253261470523.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
<jats:p>Clinical trials with psychedelics face several challenges that are not present to such a degree with other pharmacotherapeutics. Psychedelic therapies often include a significant therapeutic container, including preparatory and integrative psychotherapy, along with supportive intervention during dosing sessions. All these are likely to have an effect on the outcomes. Additionally, the influence of the therapeutic relationship between study subjects and study therapists is often more pronounced and more impactful on the outcomes as it is in pharmacotherapies that do not require psychotherapy. Perhaps the most important challenge with psychedelic-assisted therapy trials is the inability to effectively conceal the assignment in placebo-controlled settings. Many different approaches have been tried, however, all have suffered from a complete or significant functional unblinding making it difficult to discern the true therapeutic effect of the psychedelic in conjunction with the psychotherapeutic modalities which accompany it from a positive expectancy effect (often in the subjects receiving active intervention), which is further compounded by an additional negative expectancy effect (often in the subjects receiving placebo). This can be particularly problematic if functional unblinding is not just a nuisance variable but is deeply connected with the mechanism of therapeutic action itself. In this manuscript, we discuss various advantages and disadvantages of currently available approaches utilized in psychedelic trials and propose conceptual and methodological perspectives on approaching these problems.</jats:p>
Journal
T
IF:
4
Papers:
436
Citations:
1.5K
Organization
Cited Papers