arrow
返回

Conceptualization in Reference Production: Probabilistic Modeling and Experimental Testing

delete2019-04-01
delete20
delete
OA
AI
R
Roger P. G. van Gompel *
K
Kees van Deemter
A
Albert Gatt
R
Rick Snoeren
E
Emiel Krahmer
DOI:10.1037/rev0000138delete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
In psycholinguistics, there has been relatively little work investigating conceptualization-how speakers decide which concepts to express. This contrasts with work in natural language generation (NLG), a subfield of artificial intelligence, where much research has explored content determination during the generation of referring expressions. Existing NLG algorithms for conceptualization during reference production do not fully explain previous psycholinguistic results, so we developed new models that we tested in three language production experiments. In our experiments, participants described target objects to another participant. In Experiment 1, either size, color, or both distinguished the target from all distractor objects; in Experiment 2, either color, type, or both color and type distinguished it from all distractors; In Experiment 3, color, size, or the border around the object distinguished the target. We tested how well the different models fit the distribution of description types (e.g., small candle, gray candle, small gray candle) that participants produced. Across these experiments, the probabilistic referential overspecification model (PRO) provided the best fit. In this model, speakers first choose a property that rules out all distractors. If there is more than one such property, then they probabilistically choose one on the basis of a preference for that property. Next, they sometimes add another property, with the probability again determined by its preference and speakers' eagerness to overspecify.
Keyword:
reference production
referring expressions
conceptualization
overspecification
computational models

期刊

Psychological Review 封面图
Psychological Review
IF:
5.8
论文数:
1.8K
被引数:
3.2W

机构

U
University of Dundee
学者数:
1.3W
论文数: 1.1W
被引数: 1.6W
U
Utrecht University
学者数:
6.0W
论文数: 5.1W
被引数: 5.8W
U
University of Malta
学者数:
2.4K
论文数: 2.1K
被引数: 3.1K
T
tilburg university
学者数:
4.8K
论文数: 5.7K
被引数: 4
学者 查看更多机构
引用论文

引用论文

暂无论文信息