arrow
返回

Contested externalisation: responses to global inequalities

delete2019-12-02
delete11
delete
OA
AI
T
Thomas Faist *
DOI:10.1186/s40878-019-0158-ydelete
delete原文链接
delete分享
delete收藏
查看原文
摘要

摘要

En 中文
What is new about contemporary remote control across borders? An important element is the reference to human rights norms by various political actors such as NGOs, migrant associations but also national governments, international organisations and an activist judiciary. It is evident that externalisation policies mirror stark power asymmetries of the global and regional political orders, and thus reflect social inequalities more generally. The contestation around externalized migration control has gone through several periods. Integral to an understanding of control are the practices of migrants themselves, how they seek to circumvent controls or even resist. Thinking further ahead, we may conceive of the border as a paradox, involving both connecting and separating humans and artefacts. Such an understanding of border allows for the possibility of coexistence; difference between two or more entities being a requirement. The border does not belong to either side. How to imagine such a type of border between states is a formidable challenge to social theory.
Keyword:
Externalization
Border(s)
Social and global inequalities
Migration control
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

C
Comparative Migration Studies
IF:
3.7
论文数:
460
被引数:
1.6K

机构

U
University of Bielefeld
学者数:
6.4K
论文数: 6.0K
被引数: 5
引用论文

引用论文

err
IF0
err
err0
PREAI
err
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容