.png){kind=icon}
返回
Correcting attrition bias using changes-in-changes
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.jeconom.2024.105737.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Attrition is a common and potentially important threat to internal validity in treatment effect studies. We extend the changes-in-changes approach to identify the average treatment effect for respondents and the entire study population in the presence of attrition. Our method, which exploits baseline outcome data, can be applied to randomized experiments as well as quasi-experimental difference-in-difference designs. A formal comparison highlights that while widely used corrections typically impose restrictions on whether or how response depends on treatment, our proposed attrition correction exploits restrictions on the outcome model. We further show that the conditions required for our correction can accommodate a broad class of response models that depend on treatment in an arbitrary way. We illustrate the implementation of the proposed corrections in an application to a large-scale randomized experiment.
Keyword:
Nonresponse bias
Panel data
Randomized experiments
Difference-in-differences
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
4
论文数:
5.2K
被引数:
3.0W
机构
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
Training, Wages, and Sample Selection: Estimating Sharp Bounds on Treatment Effects培训，工资和样本选择: 估计治疗效果的界限OAAI
OAAI分享收藏
分享收藏
查看更多内容