.png){kind=icon}
返回
Credible commitment and congestion pricing
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1007/s11116-012-9430-9.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Transportation analysts frequently assert that congestion pricing's political obstacles can be overcome through astute use of the toll revenue pricing generates. Such revenue recycling, however, implies that the collectors of the toll revenue will not be its final recipients, meaning that any revenue recipient must believe that the revenue collector will honor promises to deliver the money. This raises the potential for credible commitment problems. Promises to spend revenue can solve one political problem, because revenue is an easy benefit to understand, but create another one, because revenue is easy to divert. Revenue recycling may therefore not be a promising way to build political support for congestion pricing. We highlight the role commitment problems have played efforts to implement congestion pricing, using examples from around the world and then focusing on California. Because congestion reduction is a more certain benefit than any particular use of the toll revenue, demonstration projects, rather than revenue promises, will be key to pricing's political success.
Keyword:
Congestion pricing
Revenue recycling
Credible commitment
Stockholm
Political acceptability
期刊
IF:
3.3
论文数:
2.1K
被引数:
7.1K
机构
引用论文
Study on a Depressed Collector for a 75 GHz Low-Voltage Compact Gyrotron for Industrial Application
PREAI
分享收藏Edinburgh and the politics of congestion charging: Negotiating road user-charging with affected publics.png)
TRANSPORT POLICY
OAAI
TRANSPORT POLICYIF5.3
OAAI分享收藏分享收藏
查看更多内容