arrow
返回

Criteria for effective zero-deforestation commitments

delete2019-01-01
delete126
delete
OA
AI
R
Rachael Garrett *
S
Samuel A. Levy
K
Kimberly M. Carlson
T
Toby Gardner
J
Javier Godar
J
Jennifer Clapp
P
Peter Dauvergne
R
Robert Heilmayr
Y
Yann le Polain de Waroux
B
Ben Ayre
H
Holly K. Gibbs
S
Simon Hall
S
Sarah Lake
J
Jeffrey C. Milder
L
Lisa Rausch
X
Ximena Rueda
B
Britaldo Soares‐Filho
N
Nelson B. Villoria
DOI:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.11.003delete
delete原文链接
delete分享
delete收藏
查看原文
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Zero-deforestation commitments are a type of voluntary sustainability initiative that companies adopt to signal their intention to reduce or eliminate deforestation associated with commodities that they produce, trade, and/or sell. Because each company defines its own zero-deforestation commitment goals and implementation mechanisms, commitment content varies widely. This creates challenges for the assessment of commitment implementation or effectiveness. Here, we develop criteria to assess the potential effectiveness of zero-deforestation commitments at reducing deforestation within a company supply chain, regionally, and globally. We apply these criteria to evaluate 52 zero-deforestation commitments made by companies identified by Forest 500 as having high deforestation risk. While our assessment indicates that existing commitments converge with several criteria for effectiveness, they fall short in a few key ways. First, they cover just a small share of the global market for deforestation-risk commodities, which means that their global impact is likely to be small. Second, biome-wide implementation is only achieved in the Brazilian Amazon. Outside this region, implementation occurs mainly through certification programs, which are not adopted by all producers and lack third-party near-real time deforestation monitoring. Additionally, around half of all commitments include zero-net deforestation targets and future implementation deadlines, both of which are design elements that may reduce effectiveness. Zero-net targets allow promises of future reforestation to compensate for current forest loss, while future implementation deadlines allow for preemptive clearing. To increase the likelihood that commitments will lead to reduced deforestation across all scales, more companies should adopt zero-gross deforestation targets with immediate implementation deadlines and clear sanction-based implementation mechanisms in biomes with high risk of forest to commodity conversion.
Keyword:
Agriculture
Forestry
Supply chain
Conservation
Voluntary environmental policies
Sustainability standards
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

G
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS
IF:
9.1
论文数:
2.6K
被引数:
2.6W

机构

U
university of wisconsin madison
学者数:
3.8W
论文数: 2.9W
被引数: 53
B
boston university
学者数:
3.8W
论文数: 3.2W
被引数: 67
K
Kansas State University
学者数:
9.5K
论文数: 8.1K
被引数: 1.3W
University of Hawaii System 封面图
University of Hawaii System
学者数:
1.6W
论文数: 1.5W
被引数: 1.2W
University of Wisconsin System 封面图
University of Wisconsin System
学者数:
6.7W
论文数: 5.8W
被引数: 382
U
University of California Santa Barbara
学者数:
1.2W
论文数: 9.6K
被引数: 3.6W
U
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
学者数:
2.5W
论文数: 1.5W
被引数: 1.4W
University of California System 封面图
University of California System
学者数:
37.5W
论文数: 33.7W
被引数: 6.6K
U
University of Waterloo
学者数:
2.2W
论文数: 2.3W
被引数: 3.3W
C
Cornell University
学者数:
6.3W
论文数: 5.4W
被引数: 10.9W
M
McGill University
学者数:
5.5W
论文数: 4.9W
被引数: 7.0W
Stockholm Environment Institute 封面图
Stockholm Environment Institute
学者数:
471
论文数: 549
被引数: 23
U
University of British Columbia
学者数:
7.0W
论文数: 6.1W
被引数: 8.6W
学者 查看更多机构