arrow
返回

Criteria for evaluating usability evaluation methods

delete2001-12-01
delete155
PRE
AI
H
Hartson, HR
A
Andre, RS
W
Williges, RC
DOI:10.1207/S15327590IJHC1304_03delete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
The current variety of alternative approaches to usability evaluation. methods UEMs) designed to assess and improve usability in software systems is offset by a general lack of understanding of the capabilities and limitations of each. Practitioners need to know which methods are more effective and in what ways and for what purposes. However, UEMs cannot be evaluated and compared reliably because of the lack of standard criteria for comparison. In this article, we present a practical discussion of factors, comparison criteria, and UEM performance measures useful in studies comparing UEMs. In demonstrating the importance of developing appropriate UEM evaluation criteria, we offer operational definitions and possible measures of UEM performance. We highlight specific challenges that researchers and practitioners face in comparing UEMs and provide a point of departure for further discussion and refinement of the principles and techniques used to approach UEM evaluation and comparison.
Keyword:
DAMAGED MERCHANDISE
WALKTHROUGHS
INTERFACE
ISSUES

期刊

I
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
IF:
4.9
论文数:
4.4K
被引数:
1.2W

机构

暂无机构信息
引用论文

引用论文

Effectiveness of a Primary Care Intervention to Support Reading Aloud: A Multicenter Evaluation
err2005-07-01
err0
PREAI
errRobert Needlman; Karen H. Toker; Benard P. Dreyer; Perri Klass; Alan L. Mendelsohn
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
Duration Modeling of Spatial Point Patterns
err2010-09-03
err0
errOAAI
errPasquale A. Pellegrini; Steven Reader
err分享
err收藏
Global Routine Vaccination Coverage, 2016
err2017-11-17
err0
errOAAI
errLeora R. Feldstein; Stephanie Mariat; Marta Gacic-Dobo; Mamadou S. Diallo; Laura M. Conklin; Aaron S. Wallace
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容