返回
Criteria for evaluating usability evaluation methods
DOI:10.1207/S15327590IJHC1304_03.png)
摘要
En 中文
The current variety of alternative approaches to usability evaluation. methods UEMs) designed to assess and improve usability in software systems is offset by a general lack of understanding of the capabilities and limitations of each. Practitioners need to know which methods are more effective and in what ways and for what purposes. However, UEMs cannot be evaluated and compared reliably because of the lack of standard criteria for comparison. In this article, we present a practical discussion of factors, comparison criteria, and UEM performance measures useful in studies comparing UEMs. In demonstrating the importance of developing appropriate UEM evaluation criteria, we offer operational definitions and possible measures of UEM performance. We highlight specific challenges that researchers and practitioners face in comparing UEMs and provide a point of departure for further discussion and refinement of the principles and techniques used to approach UEM evaluation and comparison.
Keyword:
DAMAGED MERCHANDISE
WALKTHROUGHS
INTERFACE
ISSUES
期刊
I
IF:
4.9
论文数:
4.4K
被引数:
1.2W
机构
暂无机构信息
引用论文
Investigation of occurrence patterns of respiratory syncytial virus A and B in infected-patients from Cheonan, Korea对韩国天安市感染患者中呼吸道合胞病毒A和B发生模式的调查
Emotional and Behavioural issues in children during early Phases of school opening after Covid 19 Pandemic in Eastern India新冠疫情后印度东部学校开学早期儿童的情绪与行为问题

