.png){kind=icon}
返回
Critical appraisal
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1080/1750984X.2021.1952471.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
The purpose of the current article is to define critical appraisal, identify its benefits, discuss conceptual issues influencing the adequacy of a critical appraisal, and detail procedures to help reviewers undertake critical appraisals. A critical appraisal involves a careful and systematic assessment of a study's trustworthiness or methodological rigour, and contributes to assessing how confident people can be in the findings of a set of studies. To help reviewers include high quality critical appraisals in their articles, they can consider differences between quality and bias, the value of total quality scores, the advantages and disadvantages of standardized checklists, the relevance of the experimental hierarchy of evidence, the differences between critical appraisal tools and reporting standards, and the challenges involved in appraising qualitative research. The steps involved in a sound critical appraisal include: (a) identifying the study type(s) of the individual paper(s), (b) identifying appropriate criteria and checklist(s), (c) selecting an appropriate set of criteria and checklist, (d) performing the appraisal, and (e) summarizing and using the results. Although these steps apply to critical appraisals of both quantitative and qualitative research, they require reviewers to make and defend a number of decisions resulting from the subjective features involved in assessing research.
Keyword:
Systematic review
critical appraisal
research synthesis
evidence-based practice
methodological assessment
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
6.7
论文数:
305
被引数:
2.6K
机构
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
Quality assessment of qualitative evidence for systematic review and synthesis: Is it meaningful, and if so, how should it be performed?用于系统审查和综合的定性证据的质量评估: 是否有意义，如果有意义，应如何进行？OAAI
OAAI分享收藏
查看更多内容