返回
Cross-validation for selecting a model selection procedure
DOI:10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.02.006.png)
摘要
En 中文
While there are various model selection methods, an unanswered but important question is how to select one of them for data at hand. The difficulty is due to that the targeted behaviors of the model selection procedures depend heavily on uncheckable or difficult-to-check assumptions on the data generating process. Fortunately, cross-validation (CV) provides a general tool to solve this problem. In this work, results are provided on how to apply CV to consistently choose the best method, yielding new insights and guidance for potentially vast amount of application. In addition, we address several seemingly widely spread misconceptions on CV. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keyword:
Cross-validation
Cross-validation paradox
Data splitting ratio
Adaptive procedure selection
Information criterion
LASSO
MCP
SCAD
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
4
论文数:
5.2K
被引数:
3.0W
机构
引用论文
Anastomotic Leakage Using Linear Stapling Device with Pre-attached Bioabsorbable Polyglycolic Acid Felt After Laparoscopic Anterior Resection腹腔镜前切除术后使用带有预附着生物可吸收聚乙醇酸毡的线性吻合装置的吻合口漏
PARAMETRIC OR NONPARAMETRIC? A PARAMETRICNESS INDEX FOR MODEL SELECTION参数还是非参数?模型选择的参数化指标
ANNALS OF STATISTICS
IF3.7
Task Force Consensus on Nosology and Cut‐Off Values for Axial Postural Abnormalities in Parkinsonism

