arrow
返回

Crowd science user contribution patterns and their implications

delete2015-01-05
delete187
delete
OA
AI
H
Henry Sauermann *
C
Chiara Franzoni
DOI:10.1073/pnas.1408907112delete
delete原文链接
delete分享
delete收藏
查看原文
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Scientific research performed with the involvement of the broader public (the crowd) attracts increasing attention from scientists and policy makers. A key premise is that project organizers may be able to draw on underused human resources to advance research at relatively low cost. Despite a growing number of examples, systematic research on the effort contributions volunteers are willing to make to crowd science projects is lacking. Analyzing data on seven different projects, we quantify the financial value volunteers can bring by comparing their unpaid contributions with counterfactual costs in traditional or online labor markets. The volume of total contributions is substantial, although some projects are much more successful in attracting effort than others. Moreover, contributions received by projects are very uneven across time-a tendency toward declining activity is interrupted by spikes typically resulting from outreach efforts or media attention. Analyzing user-level data, we find that most contributors participate only once and with little effort, leaving a relatively small share of users who return responsible for most of the work. Although top contributor status is earned primarily through higher levels of effort, top contributors also tend to work faster. This speed advantage develops over multiple sessions, suggesting that it reflects learning rather than inherent differences in skills. Our findings inform recent discussions about potential benefits from crowd science, suggest that involving the crowd may be more effective for some kinds of projects than others, provide guidance for project managers, and raise important questions for future research.
Keyword:
crowd science
citizen science
crowdsourcing
dynamics
effort valuation
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

P
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
IF:
9.1
论文数:
10.8W
被引数:
73.5W

机构

G
Georgia Institute of Technology
学者数:
1.8W
论文数: 1.4W
被引数: 5.9W
U
university system of georgia
学者数:
7.3W
论文数: 6.5W
被引数: 101
引用论文

引用论文

Growth of AgInS2 thin films by ultrasonic spray pyrolysis technique
err2014-01-01
err0
PREAI
errM. Anantha Sunil; K.G. Deepa; J. Nagaraju
err分享
err收藏
RNA design rules from a massive open laboratory
err2014-01-27
err222
errOAAI
errLee, Jeehyung; Kladwang, Wipapat; Lee, Minjae; Cantu, Daniel; Azizyan, Martin; Kim, Hanjoo; Limpaecher, Alex; Yoon, Sungroh; Treuille, Adrien; Das, Rhiju
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
ENRICHD and SADHART: Implications for Future Biobehavioral Intervention Efforts
err2003-01-01
err0
PREAI
errDavid S. Sheps; Kenneth E. Freedland; Robert N. Golden; Robert P. McMahon
err分享
err收藏
Interannual Synchronous Dynamics in North Temperate Lakes in Wisconsin, USA
err1998-01-01
err0
PREAI
errTimothy K. Kratz; Patricia A. Soranno; Stephen B. Baines; Barbara J. Benson; John J. Magnuson; Thomas M. Frost; Richard C. Lathrop
err分享
err收藏
Value of Adenosine Deaminase (ADA) in Ascitic Fluid for the Diagnosis of Tuberculous Peritonitis腹水中腺苷脱氨酶对结核性腹膜炎的诊断价值
err2006-09-01
err0
PREAI
errArnoldo Riquelme; Mario Calvo; Felipe Salech; Sebasti??n Valderrama; Alejandro Pattillo; Marco Arellano; Marco Arrese; Alejandro Soza; Paola Viviani; Luz Mar??a Letelier
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容