.png){kind=icon}
返回
Curling's paradox
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.cor.2004.09.026.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
There is an age old debate in curling about whether it is better to be down one point with last shot, or ahead by one point without. The objective of this paper is to apply sensitivity analysis as a methodology to differentiate what appears to be two seemingly equal scenarios. A probability tree is developed for each scenario and a comparison is made based on an expected value basis. Sensitivity analysis is performed to determine whether preference changes with changes in the key parameters. Indeed, preference is impacted by changes in these parameters. In general there is no universally preferred scenario; under specific conditions a general preference can be established. Ultimately, preference for one scenario over the other is based on an individual's perception of the probability of scoring with last shot. (c) 2004 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
C
IF:
4.3
论文数:
6.5K
被引数:
1.8W
机构
暂无机构信息
引用论文
Hyperhomocysteinemia and MTHFR C677T and A1298C polymorphisms are associated with chronic allograft nephropathy in renal transplant recipients同型半胱氨酸血症和MTHFR C677T及A1298C多态性与肾移植受者慢性移植肾肾病相关。
.png){kind=icon}
PREAI
分享收藏