arrow
返回

Data Sharing in Psychology

delete2018-02-01
delete53
delete
OA
AI
M
Maryann E. Martone *
A
Alexander García
G
Gary R. VandenBos
DOI:10.1037/amp0000242delete
delete原文链接
delete分享
delete收藏
查看原文
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Routine data sharing, defined here as the publication of the primary data and any supporting materials required to interpret the data acquired as part of a research study, is still in its infancy in psychology, as in many domains. Nevertheless, with increased scrutiny on reproducibility and more funder mandates requiring sharing of data, the issues surrounding data sharing are moving beyond whether data sharing is a benefit or a bane to science, to what data should be shared and how. Here, we present an overview of these issues, specifically focusing on the sharing of so-called long tail data, that is, data generated by individual laboratories as part of largely hypothesis-driven research. We draw on experiences in other domains to discuss attitudes toward data sharing, cost-benefits, best practices and infrastructure. We argue that the publishing of data sets is an integral component of 21st-century scholarship. Moreover, although not all issues around how and what to share have been resolved, a consensus on principles and best practices for effective data sharing and the infrastructure for sharing many types of data are largely in place.
Keyword:
open data
database
data repository
FAIR
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

American Psychologist 封面图
American Psychologist
IF:
7.2
论文数:
5.7K
被引数:
3.7W

机构

U
Universidad Politecnica de Madrid
学者数:
1.4W
论文数: 1.2W
被引数: 10
University of California System 封面图
University of California System
学者数:
37.5W
论文数: 33.7W
被引数: 6.6K
U
University of California San Diego
学者数:
4.6W
论文数: 3.5W
被引数: 924
学者 查看更多机构
引用论文

引用论文

暂无论文信息