.png){kind=icon}
返回
Demilitarizing Conservation
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1080/24694452.2025.2534550.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Many national parks and other protected areas (PAs) are experiencing an intensification of military actors, logics, and partnerships across the globe. This amounts to one of the most consequential conservation trends of this century, one that violates human rights and threatens conservation’s long-term viability. These dynamics have been chronicled in the burgeoning literature on green militarization. Set against dire predictions of biodiversity loss and the importance of both PAs and local communities in slowing this decline, this intervention makes the argument for demilitarizing conservation and sets out an initial framework for what this entails conceptually and in practice. We show howdemilitarizingconservation must be based on an ethics and politics of care and nonviolence. Although PAs are already landscapes of care for nonhuman nature, we argue for a more robustly care-full conservation that, perhaps uncomfortably, requires care to be extended to those who harm wildlife and nature more broadly. We illustrate how demilitarization requires infusing care into conservation at two related moments: the actual encounter between conservation’s transgressors and law enforcement and the larger structures that produce the encounter and military buildup as a response. The latter includes how green militarization is driven by economic logics, global patterns of economic inequality, and colonial structures that continue to shape conservation. This intervention also opens space for considering how the need for demilitarization allies with other movements like Indigenous-led and convivial conservation working to radically reshape conservation theory and practice and makes a case for explicitly including demilitarization within these efforts.
Keyword:
biodiversity conservation
green militarization
Indigenous-led conservation/convivial conservation
militarization of conservation
national parks
protected areas
30 × 30 Global Biodiversity Framework
期刊
IF:
2.9
论文数:
1.4K
被引数:
4.5K
机构
引用论文
Hubschle, A., and J. Jooste. 2017. Interview with Major General Johan Jooste (Retired), South African National Parks, Head of Special Projects. SA Crime Quarterly 60:61–68. doi: 10.17159/2413-3108/2017/v0n60a2776. (Open in a new window)Google ScholarHubschle, A., and J. Jooste. 2017. 对南非国家公园特别项目主管、已退役少将Johan Jooste的采访。SA Crime Quarterly 60:61–68. doi: 10.17159/2413-3108/2017/v0n60a2776. (在新窗口中打开)Google Scholar.png)
IF0
PREAI
分享收藏Jackson, S., and L. Palmer. 2015. Reconceptualizing ecosystem services: Possibilities for cultivating and valuing the ethics and practices of care. Progress in Human Geography 39 (2):122–45. doi: 10.1177/0309132514540016. (Open in a new window)Web of Science ®(Open in a new window)Google Scholar杰克逊, S., 和 L. 帕尔默. 2015. 重新概念化生态系统服务：培养和评估关怀伦理与实践的可能性. 人文地理学进展 39 (2):122–145. doi: 10.1177/0309132514540016. (在新窗口中打开)Web of Science ®(在新窗口中打开)谷歌学术
IF0
PREAI
分享收藏LaRocco, A., and E. Mogende. 2024. Fall from grace or back down to earth? Conservation and political conflict in Africa’s “miracle” state. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 7 (1):22–49. doi: 10.1177/25148486221101553. (Open in a new window)Google ScholarLaRocco, A., 和 E. Mogende. 2024. 跌落神坛还是回归现实？非洲“奇迹”国家的保护与政治冲突。环境与规划E：自然与空间 7 (1):22–49. doi: 10.1177/25148486221101553. (在新窗口中打开)Google Scholar
IF0
PREAI
分享收藏McEwan, C., and M. Goodman. 2010. Place geography and the ethics of care: Introductory remarks on the geographies of ethics, responsibility and care. Ethics, Place & Environment 13 (2):103–12. doi: 10.1080/13668791003778602. (Open in a new window)Google ScholarMcEwan, C., and M. Goodman. 2010. 地理与关怀伦理：关于伦理、责任和关怀地理学的引言评论。Ethics, Place & Environment 13 (2):103–12. doi: 10.1080/13668791003778602. (在新窗口中打开)Google Scholar
IF0
PREAI
分享收藏Lombard, L. 2016. Threat economies and armed conservation in northeastern Central African Republic. Geoforum 69:218–26. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.08.010. (Open in a new window)Web of Science ®(Open in a new window)Google ScholarLombard, L. 2016. 威胁经济与武装保护在中非共和国东北部。Geoforum 69:218–26. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.08.010. (在新窗口中打开)Web of Science ®(在新窗口中打开)Google Scholar
IF0
PREAI
分享收藏Lunstrum, E., and M. Ybarra. 2018. Deploying difference: Security threat narratives and state displacement from protected areas. Conservation and Society 16 (2):114–24. doi: 10.4103/cs.cs_16_119. (Open in a new window)Web of Science ®(Open in a new window)Google ScholarLunstrum, E., and M. Ybarra. 2018. 部署差异：安全威胁叙事和国家从保护区中的撤离。Conservation and Society 16 (2):114–24. doi: 10.4103/cs.cs_16_119. (在新窗口中打开) Web of Science ®(在新窗口中打开) Google Scholar
IF0
PREAI
分享收藏Mansuy, N., D. Staley, S. Alook, B. Parlee, A. Thomson, D. B. Littlechild, M. Munson, and F. Didzena. 2023. Indigenous protected and conserved areas (IPCAs): Canada’s new path forward for biological and cultural conservation and Indigenous well-being. FACETS 8:1–16. doi: 10.1139/facets-2022-0118. (Open in a new window)Web of Science ®(Open in a new window)Google ScholarMansuy, N., D. Staley, S. Alook, B. Parlee, A. Thomson, D. B. Littlechild, M. Munson, and F. Didzena. 2023. 原住民保护与保育区（IPCAs）：加拿大在生物与文化保护及原住民福祉方面的新前进道路。FACETS 8:1–16. doi: 10.1139/facets-2022-0118. (在新窗口中打开) Web of Science ®(在新窗口中打开) Google Scholar
IF0
PREAI
分享收藏Ramutsindela, M., F. Matose, and T. Mushonga. 2022. The violence of conservation in Africa: State, militarization and alternatives. Northampton, UK: Edward Elgar. (Open in a new window)Google ScholarRamutsindela, M., F. Matose, and T. Mushonga. 2022. 《非洲的保护暴力：国家、军事化与替代方案》。英国诺斯安普顿：爱德华·埃尔加出版社。 (在新窗口中打开)Google Scholar
IF0
PREAI
分享收藏Sandbrook, C., S. Albury-Smith, J. R. Allan, N. Bhola, H. C. Bingham, D. Brockington, A. B. Byaruhanga, J. Fajardo, J. Fitzsimons, P. Franks, et al. 2023. Social considerations are crucial to success in implementing the 30 × 30 global conservation target. Nature Ecology & Evolution 7 (6):784–85. doi: 10.1038/s41559-023-02048-2. (Open in a new window)PubMed (Open in a new window)Web of Science ®(Open in a new window)Google ScholarSandbrook, C., S. Albury-Smith, J. R. Allan, N. Bhola, H. C. Bingham, D. Brockington, A. B. Byaruhanga, J. Fajardo, J. Fitzsimons, P. Franks, et al. 2023. 社会因素对于成功实施30 × 30全球保护目标至关重要。Nature Ecology & Evolution 7 (6):784–85. doi: 10.1038/s41559-023-02048-2. (在新窗口中打开)PubMed (在新窗口中打开)Web of Science ®(在新窗口中打开)Google Scholar
IF0
PREAI
分享收藏Sène, A. 2024. A reflection on imperialism in nature conservation from African conceptions of care. Environmental Communication 18 (1–2):15–20. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2024.2306587. (Open in a new window)Web of Science ®(Open in a new window)Google ScholarSène, A. 2024. 基于非洲关怀观念反思自然保护中的帝国主义。Environmental Communication 18 (1–2):15–20. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2024.2306587. (在新窗口中打开)Web of Science ®(在新窗口中打开)Google Scholar
IF0
PREAI
分享收藏
查看更多内容