.png){kind=icon}
返回
Detached-Eddy Simulation
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1146/annurev.fluid.010908.165130.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Detached-eddy simulation (DES) was first proposed in 1997 and first used in 1999, so its full history can be Surveyed. A DES community has formed with, adepts and critics, as well as new branches. The initial motivation of high-Reynolds number, massively separated flows remains for which DES is con, vincingly more capable presently than either unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RAINS) or large-eddy simulation (LES). This review discusses compelling examples, noting the visual and quantitative success of DES. Its principal weakness is its response to ambiguous grids, in which the wall-parallel grid spacing is of die order of the boundary-layer thickness. In some situations, DES on a given grid is then less accurate than RANS on the same grid or DES on a coarser grid. Partial remedies have been found, yet dealing with thickening boundary layers and shallow separation bubbles is a central challenge. The nonmonotonic response of DES to grid refinement is disturbing to most observers, as is the absence of a theoretical order of accuracy. These issues also affect LES in any nontrivial flow. This review also covers the numerical needs of DES, gridding practices, coupling with different RANS models, derivative uses such as wall modeling in LES, and extensions such as zonal DES and delayed DES.
Keyword:
turbulence
separation
boundary layer
modeling
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
30.2
论文数:
611
被引数:
1.9W
机构
暂无机构信息
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
分享收藏Using multiple outcomes in intervention studies: improving power while controlling type I errors
OAAI
OAAI分享收藏分享收藏分享收藏
查看更多内容