arrow
返回

Determining risk model confidence sets

delete2017-08-01
delete2
PRE
AI
M
Mark Cummins *
M
Michael Dowling
F
Francesco Esposito
DOI:10.1016/j.frl.2017.02.005delete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Two alternative approaches to identifying a model confidence set (MCS) are contrasted. Together with a specification of the established MCS test, we present a new version of a test that identifies a model set satisfying the MCS requirements and is characterised by an alternative model ranking p-value. We also contrast the two MCS approaches empirically, constructing a market risk model selection exercise for the Dow Jones Industrial Average. Our adapted MCS method is shown to lead to a smaller MCS, nested within the MCS determined by the popular MCS method, and allows greater distinction between models. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Keyword:
Model confidence set
Model selection
Market risk models
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

Finance Research Letters 封面图
Finance Research Letters
IF:
6.9
论文数:
9.0K
被引数:
2.8W

机构

U
universite de rennes
学者数:
1.7W
论文数: 1.3W
被引数: 30
D
Dublin City University
学者数:
5.6K
论文数: 5.0K
被引数: 5.2K
引用论文

引用论文

The Model Confidence Set
err2011-01-01
err1.5K
PREAI
errHansen, Peter R.; Lunde, Asger; Nason, James M.
err分享
err收藏
Multiple Hypothesis Testing of Market Risk Forecasting Models
err2016-01-21
err4
errOAAI
errEsposito, Francesco P.; Cummins, Mark
err分享
err收藏