.png){kind=icon}
返回
Developing an Algorithm for Temporary Bans on New Psychoactive Substances: A Delphi Consensus Study
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1177/29767342251380375.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Background: To develop a valid algorithm for temporary bans on new psychoactive substances (NPSs) to minimize the intervention of the subjective opinions of experts in the temporary scheduling process.Methods: This study consisted of a preliminary survey, a 2-phase Delphi survey, and a final consensus survey. In Phase 1 of the Delphi survey, the importance of 7 criteria for designating subjects of temporary bans, as confirmed through a preliminary survey, was evaluated. Phase 2 survey was conducted to investigate the suitability of detailed questions representing the key criteria to be included in the algorithm. In the final phase, the final algorithm was selected, and several questions regarding the expert evaluation of the algorithm were asked. The mean scores of importance and the content validity ratio were calculated for consistency.Results: Nineteen panelists participated in a Delphi survey. The experts agreed on 5 criteria and 22 detailed questions for designating subjects of temporary bans. The finally selected algorithm involves primary evaluation of 'Abuse potential and dependence', 'Social risks', and 'Regulatory cases in reference countries' and secondary considerations about 'Pharmacological effects on the central nervous system' and 'Toxicity and harmfulness'. For expert evaluation, the preferred number of participating experts was 7. Many participants (77.8%) responded that the average expert evaluation score for temporary bans was 2 or higher.Conclusions: We developed a valid algorithm for temporary bans on NPS that can effectively regulate NPS and prevent the spread of addictive substances.
Keyword:
new psychoactive substances
Delphi study
algorithm
temporary bans
期刊
S
IF:
0
论文数:
77
被引数:
0
机构
引用论文
New psychoactive substances: challenges for drug surveillance, control, and public health responses.png)
LANCET
LANCETIF88.5
PREAI
分享收藏Stability of response characteristics of a Delphi panel: application of bootstrap data expansion
OAAI
OAAI分享收藏Delphi studies in social and health sciences—Recommendations for an interdisciplinary standardized reporting (DELPHISTAR). Results of a Delphi studyPLOS ONE
OAAI
PLOS ONEIF0
OAAI分享收藏Delphi methodology in healthcare research: How to decide its appropriateness医疗保健研究中的德尔菲方法: 如何确定其适当性OAAI
OAAI分享收藏分享收藏 没有更多内容
没有更多内容