arrow
返回

Developing, Testing, and Communicating Earthquake Forecasts: Current Practices and Future Directions

delete2024-08-13
delete2
delete
OA
AI
L
Leila Mizrahi *
I
Irina Dallo
V
van der Elst, Nicholas J.
A
Annemarie Christophersen
I
Ilaria Spassiani
M
Maximilian J. Werner
P
Pablo Iturrieta
J
José A. Bayona
I
Iunio Iervolino
M
Max Schneider
M
M. T. Page
J
Jiancang Zhuang
M
Marcus Herrmann
A
Andrew J. Michael
G
Giuseppe Falcone
W
Warner Marzocchi
D
David A. Rhoades
G
Gerstenberger, Matt
G
Gulia, Laura
D
Danijel Schorlemmer
J
Julia Becker
M
Marta Han
L
Lorena Daphna Kuratle
M
Michèle Marti
S
Stefan Wiemer
DOI:10.1029/2023RG000823delete
delete原文链接
delete分享
delete收藏
查看原文
摘要

摘要

En 中文
While deterministically predicting the time and location of earthquakes remains impossible, earthquake forecasting models can provide estimates of the probabilities of earthquakes occurring within some region over time. To enable informed decision-making of civil protection, governmental agencies, or the public, Operational Earthquake Forecasting (OEF) systems aim to provide authoritative earthquake forecasts based on current earthquake activity in near-real time. Establishing OEF systems involves several nontrivial choices. This review captures the current state of OEF worldwide and analyzes expert recommendations on the development, testing, and communication of earthquake forecasts. An introductory summary of OEF-related research is followed by a description of OEF systems in Italy, New Zealand, and the United States. Combined, these two parts provide an informative and transparent snapshot of today's OEF landscape. In Section 4, we analyze the results of an expert elicitation that was conducted to seek guidance for the establishment of OEF systems. The elicitation identifies consensus and dissent on OEF issues among a non-representative group of 20 international earthquake forecasting experts. While the experts agree that communication products should be developed in collaboration with the forecast user groups, they disagree on whether forecasting models and testing methods should be user-dependent. No recommendations of strict model requirements could be elicited, but benchmark comparisons, prospective testing, reproducibility, and transparency are encouraged. Section 5 gives an outlook on the future of OEF. Besides covering recent research on earthquake forecasting model development and testing, upcoming OEF initiatives are described in the context of the expert elicitation findings. The exact location, time, and magnitude of future earthquakes cannot be predicted. However, based on past earthquake sequences, it is possible to assess probabilities for future earthquakes. This is called earthquake forecasting. Operational Earthquake Forecasting (OEF) systems are designed to provide near-real-time authoritative earthquake forecasts, based on current earthquake activity, to aid the decision-making of various societal stakeholders. Setting up these systems is complex, involving decisions about which model to use, how to best test the model, and how to turn earthquake probability estimates into practical information. This review captures the current state of OEF worldwide and analyzes expert recommendations on the development, testing, and communication of earthquake forecasts. Section 2 provides an overview of OEF-related research and the background knowledge required to understand the other parts. Section 3 describes existing OEF systems of Italy, New Zealand, and the United States in detail. Section 4 discusses an elicitation of expert views on modeling, testing, and communicating earthquake forecasts (Mizrahi, Dallo, & Kuratle, 2023, ). Data from the elicitation allow to identify consensus and dissent on OEF issues and provide guidance for future earthquake forecasting efforts. Finally, Section 5 gives an outlook on future OEF-related research and planned OEF efforts at various institutions. We capture the state of earthquake forecasting systems in Italy, New Zealand, and the United States, and future plans in these and other countries Experts encourage benchmark comparison, prospective testing, reproducibility and transparency, but avoid endorsing specific models or tests Experts stress the need to co-design forecast communication products with end-users to ensure their societal relevance and usefulness
Keyword:
earthquake forecasting
modeling
testing
communication
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

Reviews of Geophysics 封面图
Reviews of Geophysics
IF:
37.3
论文数:
634
被引数:
1.8W

机构

E
ETH Zurich
学者数:
3.0W
论文数: 2.4W
被引数: 8.4W
H
Helmholtz Association
学者数:
13.2W
论文数: 10.7W
被引数: 145
S
swiss federal institutes of technology domain
学者数:
9.0W
论文数: 8.0W
被引数: 163
U
University of Naples Federico II
学者数:
4.7W
论文数: 3.6W
被引数: 51
U
United States Department of the Interior
学者数:
1.4W
论文数: 1.2W
被引数: 226
I
IUSS Pavia
学者数:
580
论文数: 658
被引数: 2
U
University of Bristol
学者数:
3.1W
论文数: 3.0W
被引数: 5.3W
I
istituto nazionale geofisica e vulcanologia (ingv)
学者数:
3.3K
论文数: 2.6K
被引数: 0
United States Geological Survey 封面图
United States Geological Survey
学者数:
9.3K
论文数: 7.6K
被引数: 1.8W
学者 查看更多机构
引用论文

引用论文

err分享
err收藏
Synthesis and analysis of O,O′-dicarboxylate (dibenzyl) bispilocarpates as possible prodrugs of pilocarpine
err1992-02-01
err0
PREAI
errTomi Järvinen; Pekka Suhonen; Seppo Auriola; Jouko Vepsäläinen; Arto Urtti; Pekka Peura
err分享
err收藏
err
IF0
err
err0
PREAI
err
err分享
err收藏
Linkage of familial alzheimer disease to chromosome 14 in two large early‐onset pedigrees: Effects of marker allele frequencies on lod scores
err2005-06-07
err0
PREAI
errA. Nechiporuk; P. Fain; E. Kort; L. E. Nee; E. Frommelt; R. J. Polinsky; J. R. Korenberg; S‐M. Pulst
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
Violence in Geropsychiatry
err1997-11-01
err0
PREAI
errD Peter Birkett
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容