返回
Disabling disability amid competing ideologies
DOI:10.1136/medethics-2017-104253.png)
摘要
En 中文
This paper critiques current arguments advancing the potential for transhumanism and a range of biological and pharmacological enhancements to better human flourishing. It does so from a historical perspective weighing the individualistic and competitive evolutionary theories of Darwin with the cooperative and communal theories of Prince Peter Kropotkin a generation later. In doing so it proposes the transhumanist and enhancement enthusiasts operate within a paradigm similar to Darwin's, one that is atomist and individualistic. The critique, which considers the status of those with cognitive, sensory and physical limits, advances a vision of society as a cooperative and communal rather than individualistic and competitive. Within this framework the argument is not one of either/ or but on the lexicographical superiority of the communal and social over the individualistic and competitive ethos underlying both Darwin and most contemporary transhumanist literature. This reordering of priorities, it is argued, reflects advances in contemporary biology and evolutionary thinking.
Keyword:
CHALLENGE
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
3.4
论文数:
7.0K
被引数:
6.4K
机构
引用论文
Análise da Revisão Cochrane: Terapêutica Farmacológica da Hiperuricemia em Doentes Hipertensos. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;4:CD008652.Cochrane系统评价分析:高血压患者高尿酸血症的药物治疗。Cochrane数据库系统评价。2017;4:CD008652。

