返回
Discriminative predicate path mining for fact checking in knowledge graphs
DOI:10.1016/j.knosys.2016.04.015.png)
摘要
En 中文
Traditional fact checking by experts and analysts cannot keep pace with the volume of newly created information. It is important and necessary, therefore, to enhance our ability to computationally determine whether some statement of fact is true or false. We view this problem as a link-prediction task in a knowledge graph, and present a discriminative path-based method for fact checking in knowledge graphs that incorporates connectivity, type information, and predicate interactions. Given a statement S of the form (subject, predicate, object), for example, (Chicago, capitalOf, Illinois), our approach mines discriminative paths that alternatively define the generalized statement (U.S. city, predicate, U.S. state) and uses the mined rules to evaluate the veracity of statement S. We evaluate our approach by examining thousands of claims related to history, geography, biology, and politics using a public, million node knowledge graph extracted from Wikipedia and PubMedDB. Not only does our approach significantly outperform related models, we also find that the discriminative predicate path model is easily interpretable and provides sensible reasons for the final determination. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keyword:
Fact checking
Path finding
Knowledge graph
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
K
IF:
7.6
论文数:
1.3W
被引数:
4.5W
机构
引用论文
Changes in Disparity in County-Level Diagnosed Diabetes Prevalence and Incidence in the United States, between 2004 and 2012
PLOS ONE
IF0
skn-1, a maternally expressed gene required to specify the fate of ventral blastomeres in the early C. elegans embryo
Cell
IF0

