.png){kind=icon}
返回
Do Constitutional Rights Make a Difference?
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1111/ajps.12239.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Although the question of whether constitutional rights matter is of great theoretical and practical importance, little is known about whether constitutional rights impact government behavior. In this article, we test the effectiveness of six political rights. We hypothesize that a difference exists between organizational rights-most notably, the rights to unionize and form political parties-and individual rights. Specifically, we suggest that organizational rights increase de facto rights protection because they create organizations with the incentives and means to protect the underlying right, which renders these rights self-enforcing. Such organizations are not necessarily present to protect individual rights, which could make individual rights less effective. We test our theory using a variety of statistical methods on a data set of constitutional rights for 186 countries. The results support our theory: Organizational rights are associated with increased de facto rights protection, while individual rights are not.
Keyword:
INTERNATIONAL HUMAN-RIGHTS
STATE REPRESSION
DEMOCRACY
TREATIES
LAW
PARCHMENT
RESPECT
THREAT
期刊
IF:
5.6
论文数:
2.7K
被引数:
1.6W
机构
引用论文
The Informative Power of Treaty Commitment: Using the Spatial Model to Address Selection Effects
PREAI
分享收藏''Constitutional promises'' and repressive reality: A cross-national time-series investigation of why political and civil liberties are suppressed.png)
JOURNAL OF POLITICS
JOURNAL OF POLITICSIF3.8
PREAI
分享收藏
查看更多内容