.png){kind=icon}
返回
Do electrostatic interactions make a difference in physics-based AutoDock4 scoring function?
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1002/jcc.27373.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Physics-based scoring function AutoDock4 is one of the most successfully applied tools in the area of structure-based drug design. However, current scoring functions are still far from being perfect. In a recent work highlighting the strengths and deficiencies of current scoring functions, we discovered that the residual error of Delta G(bind) predictions made by AutoDock4 is highly correlated to the presence of formally charged fragments in a ligand. In this work, we study how the use of the high-quality atomic charges, applied for contemporary force fields calculation, affects the quality of the experimental Delta G(bind) prediction by means of AutoDock4. We initially expected that the previously found discrepancy could be attributed to the Gasteiger charges used within AutoDock4. We show that AutoDock4 is, surprisingly, not sensitive to the charges used, and the use of QC-derived atomic charges does not lead to any statistical improvements. We also briefly discuss the role of the explicit empirical hydrogen bond term along with the electrostatic term.
Keyword:
ITERATIVE PARTIAL EQUALIZATION
FORCE-FIELD
AUTOMATED DOCKING
MODEL
OPTIMIZATION
PREDICTION
PARAMETERS
ACCURACY
ACIDS
VI
期刊
IF:
4.8
论文数:
7.1K
被引数:
6.1W
机构
引用论文
DOCK 6: Combining techniques to model RNA-small molecule complexesDOCK 6: 结合技术对RNA-小分子复合物进行建模.png)
RNA
OAAI
RNAIF5
OAAI分享收藏ff19SB: Amino-Acid-Specific Protein Backbone Parameters Trained against Quantum Mechanics Energy Surfaces in Solutionff19SB: 针对溶液中的量子力学能量表面训练的氨基酸特异性蛋白质主链参数
OAAI
OAAI分享收藏Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic Charges. AM1-BCC model: I. Method快速、高效地产生高质量的原子电荷。AM1-BCC型号: I.方法
PREAI
分享收藏
查看更多内容