arrow
返回

Do not despair about severity-yet

delete2020-02-25
delete2
PRE
AI
M
Mathias Barra
M
Mari Broqvist
E
Erik Gustavsson
M
Martin Henriksson
N
Niklas Juth
L
Lars Sandman
C
Carl Tollef Solberg *
DOI:10.1136/medethics-2019-105870delete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
In a recent extended essay, philosopher Daniel Hausman goes a long way towards dismissing severity as a morally relevant attribute in the context of priority setting in healthcare. In this response, we argue that although Hausman certainly points to real problems with how severity is often interpreted and operationalised within the priority setting context, the conclusion that severity does not contain plausible ethical content is too hasty. Rather than abandonment, our proposal is to take severity seriously by carefully mapping the possibly multiple underlying accounts to well-established ethical theories, in a way that is both morally defensible and aligned with the term's colloquial uses.
Keyword:
allocation of health care resources
distributive justice
ethics
health economics
public health ethics
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

Journal of Medical Ethics 封面图
Journal of Medical Ethics
IF:
3.4
论文数:
7.0K
被引数:
6.4K

机构

U
university of bergen
学者数:
2.0W
论文数: 1.7W
被引数: 19
L
Linkoping University
学者数:
1.6W
论文数: 1.5W
被引数: 184
K
Karolinska Institutet
学者数:
5.8W
论文数: 4.8W
被引数: 7.1W
学者 查看更多机构
引用论文

引用论文

A new proposal for priority setting in Norway: Open and fair
err2016-03-01
err69
errOAAI
errOttersen, Trygve; Forde, Reidun; Kakad, Meetali; Kjellevold, Alice; Melberg, Hans Olav; Moen, Atle; Ringard, Anen; Norheim, Ole Frithjof
err分享
err收藏
The significance of 'severity'
err2019-06-27
err18
PREAI
errHausman, Daniel
err分享
err收藏
Atmospheric Things
err
IF0
err2018-06-29
err0
PREAI
errDerek P. McCormack
err分享
err收藏
没有更多内容