arrow
返回

DOES BETTER INFORMATION ABOUT THE GOOD AVOID THE EMBEDDING EFFECT

delete1995-05-01
delete18
PRE
AI
T
Thomas C. Brown *
S
Susan C. Barro
M
Michael J. Manfredo
G
George L. Peterson
DOI:10.1006/jema.1995.0026delete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
In contingent valuation, embedding refers to the solicitation of willingness to pay for a good that is valued as a component of a larger good. This study addressed one of the criticisms of previous embedding studies, that the good was inadequately described to respondents. We tested for the effect of embedding on willingness to pay for natural area protection under three information levels, and found that amount of information had little impact on the effect of embedding on willingness to pay-under all three information conditions, embedding significantly lowered willingness to pay. If this and other embedding studies can be interpreted as indicating that many people consider related public goods to be close substitutes, then embedding studies demonstrate the considerable sensitivity of respondents to information about substitutes. Successful use of contingent valuation to value public goods relies on agreement about how to present information about substitutes.
Keyword:
ECONOMIC VALUE
CONTINGENT VALUATION
WILLINGNESS TO PAY
SUBSTITUTES
EMBEDDING EFFECT
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

Journal of Environmental Management 封面图
Journal of Environmental Management
IF:
8.4
论文数:
2.8W
被引数:
13.7W

机构

暂无机构信息
引用论文

引用论文

暂无论文信息