.png){kind=icon}
返回
Does cognitive control have a general stability/flexibility tradeoff problem?
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.cobeha.2024.101389.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
The claim that cognitive control is constrained by a general stability-flexibility tradeoff dimension has inspired research, ranging from modeling of basic control phenomena to cognitive implications for psychiatric conditions. Yet, the results with variants of the task-switching paradigm show (1) evidence of 'anti-tradeoff' patterns (co-occurrence of stability and flexibility), (2) that when tradeoffs do exist, they are often directly tied to highly specific memory representations, and (3) that there is little conclusive evidence of tradeoffs for naturally occurring variability within or between individuals. Instead of a general tradeoff dimension, we suggest conceptualizing cognitive task control in terms of navigating a cognitive map that represents competing states (tasks) with varying degrees of resolution (depending on top-down control), and where highresolution encoding supports both stability and flexibility.
Keyword:
SPONTANEOUS EYEBLINK RATE
LONG-TERM-MEMORY
POSITIVE AFFECT
CONTROL MECHANISMS
INSTANCE THEORY
TASK
FLEXIBILITY
DOPAMINE
STROOP
REPRESENTATIONS
期刊
IF:
3.5
论文数:
1.3K
被引数:
6.6K
机构
引用论文
WHY THERE ARE COMPLEMENTARY LEARNING-SYSTEMS IN THE HIPPOCAMPUS AND NEOCORTEX - INSIGHTS FROM THE SUCCESSES AND FAILURES OF CONNECTIONIST MODELS OF LEARNING AND MEMORY为什么在海马和新大脑皮层中存在互补的学习系统-来自学习和记忆的连接主义模型的成功和失败的见解.png)
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEWIF5.8
PREAI
分享收藏
查看更多内容