arrow
返回

Does communicating safety matter?

delete2020-01-01
delete38
delete
OA
AI
F
Fatima Wang *
C
Carmen López
DOI:10.1016/j.annals.2019.102805delete
delete原文链接
delete分享
delete收藏
查看原文
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Tourists generally prefer to visit safe destinations. However, it is rare to see safety messages in promotional materials. Does communicating safety in destination-branding campaigns matter to tourists? We use an experimental design to explore the relationship between safety messages and visit intentions. The results show that the extent to which safety messages increase visit intentions depends on tourists' risk propensity and self-efficacy in travel planning. The effect of safety messages is greater for low-risk-propensity respondents than for high-risk-propensity respondents; it is also greater for respondents with high (compared to low) self-efficacy in travel planning. We conclude that safety messages help to promote a destination, subject to the moderating influence of cognitive tendencies.
Keyword:
Safety
Risk
Self-efficacy
Tourism
Advertising
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

Annals of Tourism Research 封面图
Annals of Tourism Research
IF:
7.8
论文数:
4.5K
被引数:
1.8W

机构

U
university of london
学者数:
21.5W
论文数: 19.7W
被引数: 305
引用论文

引用论文

P257 Importance of deep remission compared with mucosal healing only: Results from EXTEND
err2012-02-01
err0
errOAAI
errW. Sandborn; J.-F. Colombel; R. Panaccione; E. Louis; M. Yang; P. Pollack; R. Thakkar; A. Camez; P. Mulani; J. Chao
err分享
err收藏
What tourists worry about - Construction of a scale measuring tourist worries
err2009-04-01
err146
PREAI
errLarsen, Svein; Brun, Wibecke; Ogaard, Torvald
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容