.png){kind=icon}
返回
Does institutional trading affect underwriting?
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2019.101495.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
This paper investigates the impact of institutional trading on SEO lead underwriter choice. We measure the trading intensity of the lead investment bank in several different ways and find that bank trading has a significant effect on underwriter choice. A bank that concentrates its trading in particular stocks has an improved probability of earning the underwriting mandate in those stocks. We also find that the trading intensity of the lead bank has a significant effect on SEO underpricing and the composition of the underwriting syndicate. We attribute these results to the fact that banks that are large and active traders in an issuer's stock have a competitive advantage in marketing to the current shareholder base. For smaller banks, we show that concentrating the bank's own trading in the issuer's stock produces similar effects.
Keyword:
MARKET
COMPENSATION
INFORMATION
REPUTATION
RETURNS
FIRMS
WARRANTS
TRADERS
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
5.9
论文数:
2.6K
被引数:
2.0W
机构
引用论文
分享收藏
Investment bank reputation and the price and quality of underwriting services.png)
JOURNAL OF FINANCE
JOURNAL OF FINANCEIF9.5
PREAI
分享收藏Information and the intermediary: Are market intermediaries informed traders in electronic markets?
PREAI
分享收藏
查看更多内容