.png){kind=icon}
返回
Does response interference contribute to face composite effects?
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.3758/PBR.16.2.258.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Holistic processing of faces can be measured as a failure of selective attention to one face-half under instructions to ignore the other face-half in a naming or same/different matching task. But is interference from the irrelevant half due to response interference rather than to holistic processing? Here, participants learned to name two faces Fred and two Bob, At test, composites were created from top and bottom halves of different learned faces or of a novel face, and composites were either aligned or misaligned. Naming was slower when the irrelevant half was from a different face as opposed to the same face, regardless of whether it was associated with the same name, a different name, or no name, suggesting holistic processing. Interference was eliminated when composite halves were misaligned. These results suggest that, unlike Stroop effects, composite effects are not due to response interference.
Keyword:
PARTS
RECOGNITION
PERCEPTION
ACCOUNT
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
P
IF:
3
论文数:
4.5K
被引数:
1.5W
机构
引用论文
HALF A CENTURY OF RESEARCH ON THE STROOP EFFECT - AN INTEGRATIVE REVIEW.png)
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETINOAAI
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETINIF19.8
OAAI分享收藏分享收藏
分享收藏
查看更多内容