arrow
返回

Does sexual selection explain human sex differences in aggression?

delete2009-08-20
delete404
delete
OA
AI
J
John Archer *
DOI:10.1017/S0140525X09990951delete
delete原文链接
delete分享
delete收藏
查看原文
摘要

摘要

En 中文
I argue that the magnitude and nature of sex differences in aggression, their development, causation, and variability, can be better explained by sexual selection than by the alternative biosocial version of social role theory. Thus, sex differences in physical aggression increase with the degree of risk, occur early in life, peak in young adulthood, and are likely to be mediated by greater male impulsiveness, and greater female fear of physical danger. Male variability in physical aggression is consistent with all alternative life history perspective, and context-dependent variability with responses to reproductive competition, although some variability follows the internal and external influences of social roles. Other sex differences, in variance in reproductive output, threat displays, size and strength, maturation rates, and mortality and conception rates, all indicate that male aggression is part of a sexually selected adaptive complex. Physical aggression between partners can be explained rising different evolutionary principles, arising from the conflicts of interest between males and females entering a reproductive alliance, combined with variability following differences in societal gender roles. In this case, social roles are particularly important since they enable both the relatively equality in physical aggression between partners from Western nations, and the considerable cross-national variability, to be explained.
Keyword:
aggression
partner violence
sex differences
sexual selection
social role theory
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 封面图
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
IF:
13.7
论文数:
1.6W
被引数:
1.2W

机构

U
University of Central Lancashire
学者数:
2.9K
论文数: 2.9K
被引数: 3.5K
引用论文

引用论文

Cortisol and testosterone concentrations in wheelchair athletes during submaximal wheelchair ergometry
err2001-02-16
err0
PREAI
errJohn W. Castellani; Lawrence E. Armstrong; Robert W. Kenefick; Angela A. Pasqualicchio; Deborah Riebe; Catherine L. V. Gabaree; Carl M. Maresh
err分享
err收藏
Trial-level association between response-based endpoints (RBEs) and progression-free (PFS)/overall survival (OS) in first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in the ARCAD database.
err2015-01-20
err0
PREAI
errElisabeth Coart; Everardo D. Saad; Qian Shi; Dirkje Willemien Sommeijer; John Raymond Zalcberg; Tim Maughan; Richard M. Goldberg; Hans-Joachim Schmoll; Cornelis J. A. Punt; Eric Van Cutsem; Jean-Yves Douillard; Paulo Marcelo Hoff; Niall C. Tebbutt; Charles S. Fuchs; Alfredo Falcone; Christophe Tournigand; Aimery De Gramont; Daniel J. Sargent; Tomasz Burzykowski; Marc E. Buyse
err分享
err收藏
Impact of overall severity of adverse events (AEs) on long-term outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients (pts) treated with first line systemic chemotherapy: Findings from 3,971 pts in the ARCAD database.
err2017-05-20
err0
PREAI
errJohn Raymond Zalcberg; Qian Shi; Danielle Angela Ferraro; Jeffrey P. Meyers; Leonard Saltz; Richard Goldberg; Eric Van Cutsem; Herbert Hurwitz; Charles Fuchs; Carsten Bokemeyer; Daniel J. Sargent; Aimery De Gramont; Timothy Jay Price; Richard Adams
err分享
err收藏
Two-year outcomes of RTOG 0529: A phase II evaluation of dose-painted IMRT in combination with 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin-C for the reduction of acute morbidity in carcinoma of the anal canal.
err2011-02-01
err0
PREAI
errL. A. Kachnic; K. A. Winter; R. J. Myerson; M. D. Goodyear; J. Willins; J. Esthappan; M. G. Haddock; M. Rotman; P. J. Parikh; C. G. Willett
err分享
err收藏
Comparison of fat-free mass and body fat in Swiss and American adults
err2005-02-01
err40
PREAI
errKyle, UG; Genton, L; Lukaski, HC; Dupertuis, YM; Slosman, DO; Hans, D; Pichard, C
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容