返回
Does the embedded atom model have predictive power?
DOI:10.3367/UFNe.2020.01.038761.png)
摘要
En 中文
Potassium, rubidium, aluminum, iron, nickel, and tin embedded atom models (EAMs) have been used as examples to ascertain how well the properties of a metal are described by EAM potentials calculated from the shape of shock adiabats and/or static compression data (from a function of cold pressure). Verification of the EAM potential implies an evaluation of its predictive power and an analysis of the agreement with experiment both at 0 or 298 K and under shock compression. To obtain consistent results, all contributions of collectivized electrons to energy and pressure need to be taken into consideration, especially in transition metals. Taking account of or ignoring electron contributions has little effect on the calculated melting lines of the models, self-diffusion coefficients, and viscosity. The shape of the melting line is sensitive to the behavior of the repulsive branch of the pair contribution to the EAM potential at small distances.
Keyword:
embedded atom model (EAM)
molecular dynamics method
embedding potential
electron contributions
predictive power
tandem
static compression
shock compression
期刊
P
IF:
3.4
论文数:
2.3K
被引数:
6.1K
机构
暂无机构信息
引用论文
Enzymes of the Last Steps of Chlorophyll Biosynthesis: Modification of the Substrate Structure Helps To Understand the Topology of the Active Centers
Biochemistry
IF0
Conservatism and liberalism predict performance in two nonideological cognitive tasks保守主义和自由主义对两项非意识形态认知任务的表现进行了预测
A cobalt tungstate compound sensing electrode for hydrogen detection based upon mixed-potential type sensors
RSC Advances
IF0
Effect of growth stage, cultivar, and root wounding on disease development in cotton caused by Fusarium wilt race 4 (Fusarium oxysporumf. sp.vasinfectum)
Crop Science
IF0

