.png){kind=icon}
返回
Does using stepwise variable selection to build sequential path analysis models make sense?
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1111/j.1399-3054.2010.01431.x.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Causal inference methods - mainly path analysis and structural equation modeling - offer plant physiologists information about cause-and-effect relationships among plant traits. Recently, an unusual approach to causal inference through stepwise variable selection has been proposed and used in various works on plant physiology. The approach should not be considered correct from a biological point of view. Here, it is explained why stepwise variable selection should not be used for causal inference, and shown what strange conclusions can be drawn based upon the former analysis when one aims to interpret cause-and-effect relationships among plant traits.
Keyword:
GRAIN-YIELD
TRAITS
LEAVES
L.
INTERRELATIONSHIPS
GENOTYPES
GRADIENT
CLIMATE
PLANT
AREA
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
3.6
论文数:
6.8K
被引数:
2.0W
机构
引用论文
Causal mechanism for determination of grain yield and milling quality of lowland rice.png)
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH
FIELD CROPS RESEARCHIF6.4
PREAI
分享收藏Annual rainfall does not directly determine the carbon isotope ratio of leaves of Eucalyptus species
PREAI
分享收藏
查看更多内容