.png){kind=icon}
返回
Ecology and valuation: Big changes needed
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.02.013.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Ecological Economics has developed as a transdisciplinary science, but it has not taken significant steps toward a truly integrated process of evaluating anthropogenic ecological change. The emerging dominance within ecological economics of the movement to monetize ecological services, when combined with the already well-entrenched dominance of contingent pricing as a means to evaluate impacts on amenities, has created a monistic approach to valuation studies. It is argued that this monistic approach to evaluating anthropogenic impacts is inconsistent with a sophisticated conception of ecology as a complex science that rests on shifting metaphors. An alternative, pluralistic and iterative approach to valuation of anthropogenic ecological change is proposed. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keyword:
ECOSYSTEM
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
6.3
论文数:
7.8K
被引数:
3.6W
机构
暂无机构信息
引用论文
分享收藏分享收藏The evolution of preferences - Why 'sovereign' preferences may not lead to sustainable policies and what to do about it.png)
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICSIF6.3
PREAI
分享收藏分享收藏The Private Finance Initiative in English Council Housing Regeneration: A Privatisation too Far?
PREAI
分享收藏
查看更多内容