.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Editorial: Analysis of Sentiment Estimates and Cognitive Fallacies in Large Language Models
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
D
DOI：10.1002/isaf.70010.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
This paper describes some experimentation with the evolving ability of large language models to generate sentiment estimates. We find that current models seem to equal or even exceed the ability of human annotators in a case study of single sentiment sentences. In addition, using the large language models, we were able to identify a small number of sentences in the data set, where it appears that the annotator made errors in assessing the sentiment. Unfortunately, analysis of the LLM results also illustrates apparent cognitive biases in the LLM behavior. Those effects appear to include an “ostrich effect” and a “no one is good enough” effect cognitive bias in LLM sentiment estimates.
Keywords:
cognitive bias in LLM
large language models
no one is good enough effect
ostrich effect
sentiment analysis
single sentence sentiment
Journal
I
IF:
3.7
Papers:
92
Citations:
469
Organization
Cited Papers