1
Return

Effect of inoculum type and organic load on methane recovery from lipid-rich confectionery wastewater

delete2026-08-11
delete0
delete
OA
AI
A
Annalisa Russo *
A
Armando Oliva
A
Alessandra Cesaro
DOI:10.1016/j.psep.2026.109427delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
The recovery of biofuels from lipid-rich industrial waste streams offers a sustainable strategy to renewable energy production and wastewater management. In this context, the present study investigates confectionery wastewater as a substrate for biomethane production through biochemical methane potential tests under different organic loads, focusing on the influence of inoculum type, i.e., urban wastewater digestate (DWW) and anaerobic granular sludge (AnGS), initial organic matter concentration, and inoculum-to-substrate ratio. Methane production was fitted using the modified Gompertz and first-order kinetic models, while long-chain fatty acid (LCFA) degradation was assessed to evaluate possible inhibitory effects. Kinetic modelling revealed that the modified Gompertz model best describes methane production with DWW, whereas first-order kinetics more accurately represent the behaviour observed with AnGS. DWW performed better at low initial organic matter concentration, achieving 264.8 ± 21.6 mL CH₄/g tCODinf. Conversely, AnGS showed higher tolerance to high organic loads, reaching 313.5 ± 4.3 mL CH₄/g tCODinf and up to 96% LCFA degradation. These findings demonstrate that AnGS is a suitable inoculum for efficiently converting confectionery wastewater into methane, limiting LCFA inhibition and supporting the valorisation of high-strength, seasonally variable industrial wastewater.
Keywords:
Biomethane potential
industrial wastewater valorisation
LCFA biodegradation
methanogenic kinetics
inoculum selection
organic load tolerance
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Process Safety and Environmental Protection cover
Process Safety and Environmental Protection
IF:
7.8
Papers:
9.4K
Citations:
3.8W

Organization

No organization information available
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Citing Papers

Citing Papers