1
Return

Effect of Sand Type and Content on the Fiber-Bridging and Matrix Properties of K- and K/Na-Activated Metakaolin-Based Engineered Geopolymer Composites

delete2025-05-01
delete0
PRE
AI
R
Ruwa AbuFarsakh
G
Gabriel Arce
H
Hassan Noorvand
M
Marwa Hassan *
S
Sujata Subedi
M
Miladin Radović
DOI:10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-18915delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
This study explored the effects of sand type [i.e., natural river sand (RS) and manufactured microsilica sand (MS)], sand content (i.e., 0%, 30%, 45%, and 60% by volume), and fiber content (i.e., 1% and 1.5% by volume) on the fiber-bridging and matrix properties of ambient-cured K-activated and K/Na-activated metakaolin (MK)-based engineered geopolymer composites (EGCs) reinforced with ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) fiber. Experimental tests showed that incrementing sand content (i.e., from 30% to 60% by volume) generally enhanced the compressive and tensile strengths and reduced the tensile strain capacity of the composites. Additionally, the composites incorporating MS generally exhibited higher compressive and tensile strengths and lower tensile strain capacity compared to the RS composites with 1% by volume UHMWPE fiber. Based on the strength, ductility, and workability of EGCs, the optimum sand content was determined to be 45% by volume. All composites exhibited pseudostrain hardening (PSH) behavior with PSH strength and energy indices exceeding 1.3 and 2.7, respectively. Relative to the benchmark engineered cementitious composites (ECC) (M-45), the best-performing EGC developed (i.e., K/Na331 with 45% by volume MS and 1.5% by volume UHMWPE) presented greater tensile strain capacity and a slightly lower tensile strength.
Keywords:
CEMENTITIOUS COMPOSITES
MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES
MICROSTRUCTURE
BEHAVIOR
INTERFACE
DESIGN
SIZE
SLAG

Journal

J
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
IF:
3
Papers:
7.2K
Citations:
2.4W

Organization

L
louisiana state university system
Scholars:
2.2W
Papers: 2.0W
Citations: 15
L
Louisiana State University
Scholars:
9.8K
Papers: 8.0K
Citations: 1.6W
T
Texas A&M University System
Scholars:
4.4W
Papers: 4.0W
Citations: 4.0K
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Citing Papers

Citing Papers