.png){kind=icon}
返回
Effects of parameter estimation on maximum-likelihood bootstrap analysis
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.ympev.2010.04.035.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Bipartition support in maximum-likelihood (ML) analysis is most commonly assessed using the nonparametric bootstrap. Although bootstrap replicates should theoretically be analyzed in the same manner as the original data, model selection is almost never conducted for bootstrap replicates, substitution-model parameters are often fixed to their maximum-likelihood estimates (MLEs) for the empirical data, and bootstrap replicates may be subjected to less rigorous heuristic search strategies than the original data set. Even though this approach may increase computational tractability, it may also lead to the recovery of suboptimal tree topologies and affect bootstrap values. However, since well-supported bipartitions are often recovered regardless of method, use of a less intensive bootstrap procedure may not significantly affect the results. In this study, we investigate the impact of parameter estimation (i.e., assessment of substitution-model parameters and tree topology) on ML bootstrap analysis. We find that while forgoing model selection and/or setting substitution-model parameters to their empirical MLEs may lead to significantly different bootstrap values, it probably would not change their biological interpretation. Similarly, even though the use of reduced search methods often results in significant differences among bootstrap values, only omitting branch swapping is likely to change any biological inferences drawn from the data. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Keyword:
Bootstrap
Branch swapping
Heuristic search
Maximum-likelihood
Model selection
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
3.6
论文数:
7.7K
被引数:
2.0W
机构
引用论文
分享收藏Improved bootstrap confidence limits in large-scale phylogenies, with an example from Neo-Astragalus (leguminosae).png)
SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY
OAAI
SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGYIF5.7
OAAI分享收藏Should we use model-based methods for phylogenetic inference when we know that assumptions about among-site rate variation and nucleotide substitution pattern are violated?SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGYOAAI
SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGYIF5.7
OAAI分享收藏Phylogeography and molecular systematics of the Peromyscus aztecus species group (Rodentia: Muridae) inferred using parsimony and likelihoodSYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY
OAAI
SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGYIF5.7
OAAI分享收藏
查看更多内容