.png){kind=icon}
返回
Empirical analysis of support vector machine ensemble classifiers
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.eswa.2008.07.041.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Ensemble classification - combining the results of a set of base learners - has received much attention in the machine learning community and has demonstrated promising capabilities in improving classification accuracy. Compared with neural network or decision tree ensembles, there is no comprehensive empirical research in support vector machine (SVM) ensembles. To fill this void, this paper analyses and compares SVM ensembles with four different ensemble constructing techniques, namely bagging, AdaBoost, Arc-X4 and a modified AdaBoost. Twenty real-world data sets from the UCI repository are used as benchmarks to evaluate and compare the performance of these SVM ensemble classifiers by their classification accuracy. Different kernel functions and different numbers of base SVM learners are tested in the ensembles. The experimental results show that although SVM ensembles are not always better than a single SVM, the SVM bagged ensemble performs as well or better than other methods with a relatively higher generality, particularly SVMs with a polynomial kernel function. Finally, an industrial case study of gear defect detection is conducted to validate the empirical analysis results. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keyword:
Ensemble classification
Support vector machines (SVMs)
AdaBoost
Bagging
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
7.5
论文数:
3.0W
被引数:
10.2W
机构
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
分享收藏Wie lassen sich Jugendliche für Klimathemen begeistern? Chancen und Hürden in der Klimakommunikation
OAAI
OAAI分享收藏分享收藏Combination of independent component analysis and support vector machines for intelligent faults diagnosis of induction motors独立分量分析与支持向量机相结合的感应电机智能故障诊断
PREAI
分享收藏
查看更多内容