.png){kind=icon}
返回
Equilibrium anomalies
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1046/j.1540-6261.2003.00615.x.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Many empirical anomalies are actually consistent with the single beta capital asset pricing model if the empiricist utilizes an equity-only proxy for the true market portfolio. Equity betas estimated against this particular inefficient proxy will be understated, with the error increasing with the firm's leverage. Thus, firm-specific variables that correlate with leverage (such as book-to-market and size) will appear to explain returns after controlling for proxy beta simply because they capture the missing beta risk. Loadings on portfolios formed on relative leverage and relative distress completely subsume the powers of the Fama and French (1993) returns to small minus big market capitalization (SMB) portfolios and returns to high minus low book-to-market (HML) portfolios factors in explaining cross-sectional returns.
Keyword:
BOOK-TO-MARKET
FINANCIAL RATIOS
STOCK RETURNS
CROSS-SECTION
RISK
EFFICIENCY
PORTFOLIO
DISTRESS
OPTIONS
GROWTH
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
9.5
论文数:
4.0K
被引数:
5.0W
机构
暂无机构信息
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
查看更多内容