.png){kind=icon}
返回
Errors caused by peak factor assumptions in response-spectrum-based analyses
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1002/eqe.2552.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
The modal combination rules commonly used in response spectrum analyses implicitly assume that the peak factor associated with the response quantity of interest is equal to the peak factors of the contributing modal responses. In this paper, we examine the validity of this assumption and demonstrate that it causes the modal combination rules to over-represent the contribution of the higher modes of vibration to the total response and under-represent the contribution of the lower modes. Consequently, a response-spectrum-based analysis can yield a biased estimate for the peak value of a response quantity when two or more well-separated modal frequencies make significant contributions to the total response. To correct this potential bias in response-spectrum-based estimates, we develop a procedure for estimating the peak factors that is suitable to the response spectrum analysis calculations commonly used in the current design practice. Examples are presented to demonstrate the proper use and potential impact of the proposed procedure. Copyright (c) 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Keyword:
modal combination rules
peak factors
CQC
SRSS
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
E
IF:
5
论文数:
3.7K
被引数:
1.8W
机构
引用论文
分享收藏Modal Pushover-Based Scaling of Two Components of Ground Motion Records for Nonlinear RHA of Structures.png)
EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA
EARTHQUAKE SPECTRAIF3.7
PREAI
分享收藏
查看更多内容