.png){kind=icon}
返回
Evaluating Claims of Intersectionality
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1086/723813.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Over the last 40 years, scholars have adopted many different approaches to studying intersectionality. A common refrain in the literature is that one cannot evaluate the implications of an intersectional theory with an interaction model. In this article, we demonstrate that a large class of claims regarding intersectionality, whether quantitative or qualitative in nature, can only be evaluated within an interactive framework. There is some uncertainty among those who adopt quantitative methods in their intersectional research about how interaction models work. In addition to outlining the necessary evidence to support claims of intersectionality, we provide useful advice on how to appropriately specify and interpret interaction models to better evaluate these types of claims. We believe that considerable progress can be made in our empirical and theoretical understanding of intersectionality if scholars follow the advice provided in this article.
Keyword:
intersectionality
interaction models
identity
gender
race
期刊
IF:
3.8
论文数:
5.8K
被引数:
1.3W
机构
引用论文
分享收藏
分享收藏A best practices guide to intersectional approaches in psychological research心理学研究中交叉方法的最佳实践指南.png)
SEX ROLES
SEX ROLESIF3.4
PREAI
分享收藏
查看更多内容