arrow
返回

Evaluating expert judgments

delete2007-04-05
delete253
delete
OA
AI
M
Marco R. Steenbergen *
G
Gary Marks
DOI:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00694.xdelete
delete原文链接
delete分享
delete收藏
查看原文
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Although expert surveys have gained a prominent place in comparative studies of party positions on issues, their validity has been called into question. In this article, some of the validity concerns are evaluated in the context of the authors' own expert survey on national party positions vis-a-vis European integration. One goal of the article is to demonstrate that this expert survey produces valid measures of party positions. An equally important goal, however, is to suggest some methods that can help in assessing the quality of expert survey data. These methods, which are rooted in psychometric theory, are applicable in a variety of contexts and are easily implemented.
Keyword:
MODELING APPROACH
PARTY LOCATIONS
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

European Journal of Political Research 封面图
European Journal of Political Research
IF:
4.2
论文数:
2.3K
被引数:
6.0K

机构

暂无机构信息
引用论文

引用论文

err分享
err收藏
US Unemployment Insurance Replacement Rates During the Pandemic
err
IF0
err2020-05-01
err0
errOAAI
errPeter Ganong; Pascal Noel; Joseph Vavra
err分享
err收藏
Modeling multilevel data structures
err2002-01-01
err1.2K
PREAI
errSteenbergen, MR; Jones, BS
err分享
err收藏
err2006-01-01
err0
errOAAI
errGeorge Kent
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容