arrow
返回

Evaluating punctuated equilibrium dynamics within a crisis context

delete2023-10-01
delete2
PRE
AI
S
Saahir Shafi *
D
Daniel J. Mallinson
DOI:10.1332/030557321X16891538754098delete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
The theoretical evolution of punctuated equilibrium theory (PET) and empirical expansion of its research agenda to non-democratic countries, demonstrate that democratic nations feature less punctuated policymaking than autocracies, owing to informational advantages. However, can these differences be identified cross-sectionally across numerous political systems facing a common policy problem? To assess this, we present a broad and robust empirical analysis of PET dynamics across 166 countries over three years for a single policy issue that affected all nations: the COVID-19 pandemic. First, we theoretically link PET with the concepts of policy learning and bounded emulation and propose the emergence of mini cycles of punctuated equilibrium during a crisis. Then, using weekly data, we examine univariate distributions of COVID-19-related policy changes to better understand how punctuated policy dynamics have differed between political systems. Using multiple approaches, we demonstrate (1) the emergence of PET mini cycles during crises and (2) an absence of macro-level differences in PET dynamics across democratic, partially democratic and autocratic countries. Our evaluation of policy change distributions across a wide range of political systems in a crisis context offers notable insights into the generalisability of PET dynamics. Thus, our article offers novel advancements to PET scholarship both theoretically and empirically.
Keyword:
punctuated equilibrium
autocracies
policy learning
bounded emulation
crisis response
COVID-19
PET
crisis policy

期刊

P
Policy and Politics
IF:
3.1
论文数:
1.3K
被引数:
1.9K

机构

California State University, Dominguez Hills 封面图
California State University, Dominguez Hills
学者数:
337
论文数: 302
被引数: 487
California State University System 封面图
California State University System
学者数:
2.8W
论文数: 2.4W
被引数: 457
引用论文

引用论文

暂无论文信息