arrow
返回

Evaluating Sampling Methods for Content Analysis of Twitter Data

delete2018-05-02
delete100
delete
OA
AI
H
Hwalbin Kim *
S
S. Mo Jones-Jang
A
Anan Wan
DOI:10.1177/2056305118772836delete
delete原文链接
delete分享
delete收藏
查看原文
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Despite the existing evaluation of the sampling options for periodical media content, only a few empirical studies have examined whether probability sampling methods can be applicable to social media content other than simple random sampling. This article tests the efficiency of simple random sampling and constructed week sampling, by varying the sample size of Twitter content related to the 2014 South Carolina gubernatorial election. We examine how many weeks were needed to adequately represent 5 months of tweets. Our findings show that a simple random sampling is more efficient than a constructed week sampling in terms of obtaining a more efficient and representative sample of Twitter data. This study also suggests that it is necessary to produce a sufficient sample size when analyzing social media content.
Keyword:
simple random sampling
constructed week sampling
content analysis
Twitter data
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

Social Media and Society 封面图
Social Media and Society
IF:
4.9
论文数:
1.4K
被引数:
7.4K

机构

H
Hallym University
学者数:
7.9K
论文数: 7.4K
被引数: 4.0K
U
university of south carolina columbia
学者数:
9.6K
论文数: 8.5K
被引数: 7
U
University of South Carolina System
学者数:
1.6W
论文数: 1.5W
被引数: 27
学者 查看更多机构
引用论文

引用论文

err分享
err收藏
Long‐term effects of soil nutrient deficiency on arbuscular mycorrhizal communities
err2012-01-04
err0
errOAAI
errPedro M. Antunes; Anika Lehmann; Miranda M. Hart; Michael Baumecker; Matthias C. Rillig
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
Sample size for newspaper content analysis in multi-year studies
err2001-12-01
err92
PREAI
errLacy, S; Riffe, D; Stoddard, S; Martin, H; Chang, KK
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容