.png){kind=icon}
返回
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
摘要
En
期刊
IF:
3.9
论文数:
2.8K
被引数:
1.8W
机构
暂无机构信息
引用论文
Perspectives on systematic review protocol registration: a survey amongst stakeholders in the clinical research publication process系统评价方案注册的观点: 临床研究发表过程中利益相关者的调查.png)
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS.png)
OAAI
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWSIF3.9
OAAI.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏Evidence-based health policy in Germany: lack of communication and coordination between academia and health authorities?SYSTEMATIC REVIEWSOAAI
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWSIF3.9
OAAI分享收藏Ranking Research Methodology by Risk - a cross-sectional study to determine the opinion of research ethics committee membersSYSTEMATIC REVIEWS
OAAI
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWSIF3.9
OAAI分享收藏Increasing the efficiency of study selection for systematic reviews using prioritization tools and a single-screening approachSYSTEMATIC REVIEWSOAAI
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWSIF3.9
OAAI分享收藏Dissemination of knowledge from Cochrane Public Health reviews: a bibliographic studySYSTEMATIC REVIEWSOAAI
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWSIF3.9
OAAI分享收藏Are research ethics committees behaving unethically? Same suggestions for improving performance and accountability研究伦理委员会的行为是否不道德？改善绩效和问责制的相同建议OAAI
OAAI分享收藏Systematic reviews are rarely used to contextualise new results-a systematic review and meta-analysis of meta-research studies系统评价很少用于说明新结果的背景-元研究研究的系统评价和荟萃分析SYSTEMATIC REVIEWSOAAI
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWSIF3.9
OAAI分享收藏Conducting separate reviews of benefits and harms could improve systematic reviews and meta-analysesSYSTEMATIC REVIEWSOAAI
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWSIF3.9
OAAI分享收藏
查看更多内容